PJCNET

Parapsychologists are trained never to use the word, “spirit” or “ghost”, so often when I use these words, I’m told I’m not scientific in my approach to being a paranormal investigator! Despite receiving some formal training which also tried to teach me not to say, “spirit”, I continue to choose to use the word after witnessing and obtaining massive amounts of evidence over the years since I started investigating the paranormal in 1996, including some scientific proof that intelligent beings exists that cannot be usually seen by the physical naked eye. One example of such evidence is from EVP experiments that have been conducted in a locked down environment, it’s amazing to hear a human voice on the recordings actually answering the questions that were asked and I’ve attended various such experiments as well as carrying many out myself. During most experiments one gets nothing, but one has to persevere and be very patient. One could say that the sounds were from outside the room, but as I said, the environment was locked down and no-one witnessed any sounds externally. If the sound was for instance radio interference, then how could it answer the questions asked exactly in synchronisation? I have personally witnessed EMF fields appearing without any known source on request when “asking out”, sometimes even with temperature fluctuations in synchronisation with each-other. This is just two examples of proof of many. I am therefore not afraid to use the word, “spirit”, meaning an intelligent conciousness that cannot usually be seen by the naked eye and a “ghost” which is a playback of a recording of an event from the past. I cannot say that ghosts certainly exist from my experience to this day as the evidence I’ve experienced hasn’t been conclusive, although I have once seen what I believed to be a full and blatant apparition of a young woman who dispersed into nothing in front of my eyes, I still cannot say this was certainly a ghost or a spirit, although it was most certainly unexplained phenomenon.

Sometimes a paranormal investigator has to assume or “pretend” that spirits exist in an attempt to obtain evidence, even when there’s absolutely no proof. I’m sure many parapsychologists who have been on paranormal investigations have “asked out” in their time. This is an example of assuming or “pretending” that spirits exist as otherwise, who are you trying to talk to? Investigators usually “ask out” to attempt to get a reaction in an attempt to obtain evidence of the existence of such unexplained phenomenon.

I certainly don’t believe that today’s conventional science has discovered even close to everything that actually exists in our universe, if it has then please explain death and what exactly happens when you die, or please explain where space actually ends, can science fully understand conciousness? One could go back in time and new scientific discoveries were usually first criticised by sceptics as they usually used controversial techniques or ideas. Many years ago, people would see an infra-red remote control as paranormal or magical, but now it’s totally accepted and explained. It’s therefore my opinion that it’s a great shame when one only investigates unexplained phenomenon using just explainable scientific techniques. Why not experiment with all possible techniques, remaining open minded with any scientifically unproven techniques to attempt to find out either way if they really do work. Throughout history people have to sometimes experiment with non proven techniques to be able to make progress as one day for instance, some psychic investigation techniques could possibly be proved and accepted by science. I am therefore researching psychic investigation techniques myself and I work with people who claim to be psychic. I’m not saying that all psychic techniques certainly work as I believe there’s a lot more to be discovered and learnt, sometimes people may even take the wrong path.

I believe I have a healthy balance between scepticism and having an open mind. On a recent investigation, one of my colleges believed he’d psychically picked up on an alleged spirit and described detailed information about them. Earlier on my other college also described in detail this spirit by whispering to me. The detailed and specific information given by both members matched which must have been thousands to one. I will continue such tests and I’ve also recorded instances where they fail to pick-up the same. I remain very open minded about psychic techniques and I’m trying to obtain as much proof as possible whether it’s for or against. To conclude that all these techniques don’t simply work without thorough investigation is in my opinion ignorance.

I was born with a very scientific brain and I’m therefore still mainly a scientific paranormal investigator, but I will continue to controversially attempt to also investigate the true effectiveness various of psychic investigation techniques if any. To fully achieve this I have to attempt to learn such psychic techniques myself. I still disagree with parapsychology that it’s unprofessional to use the word, “spirit”. Despite massive amounts of evidence that ’spirits’ really exist from literally thousands of people over the world from virtually every background, conventional science still remains closed to the possibility that spirits truly exist and by teaching parapsychologists not to even use the word “spirit” in their vocabulary, it’s in my opinion creating a large barrier to prevent future acceptance.

Please click to share this article!